From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17019 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2014 21:42:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17006 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jan 2014 21:42:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 21:42:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s08LgNe8031482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 8 Jan 2014 16:42:23 -0500 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-176.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.176]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s08LgKlC003179 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Jan 2014 16:42:21 -0500 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Doug Evans Cc: Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches Subject: Re: [RFC] Change coding style rule: 80 column "hard limit" for ChangeLogs References: <83bnzsw6ro.fsf@gnu.org> <20140105040005.GA3802@adacore.com> <20140108114544.GN3802@adacore.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 21:42:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Wed, 8 Jan 2014 12:21:26 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 On Wednesday, January 08 2014, Doug Evans wrote: > So how about a 74 soft limit and 80 hard limit for everything (modulo > things like .exp files where we try to keep things under 80 but some > lines are just long and best left as is). I'm following the discussion, and I'm happier with this rule. FWIW, I try to keep things under 76 chars, but that's only my personal rule :-). -- Sergio