From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29242 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2011 15:05:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 29232 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Jan 2011 15:05:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:05:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0VF5NYJ023225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:05:23 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0VF5MEW026704; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:05:22 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0VF5LuU029637; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:05:22 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id C732E3782CA; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:05:21 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: FYI: add user_breakpoint_p References: <20110131020543.GB2384@adacore.com> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:11:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110131020543.GB2384@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:05:43 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00583.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> Just one question about style: >> - if (!user_settable_breakpoint (tp) || tp->number < 0) >> + if (! user_breakpoint_p (tp)) Joel> Do we agree on whether to write this as the above, or whether we should Joel> not have a space between the '!' and the expression being negated: I have trouble remembering whether we have a rule here. I will remove the space. It doesn't matter to me either way if we have it or not. Tom