From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30991 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2010 18:17:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 30966 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Aug 2010 18:16:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:16:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7GIGqq0001690 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:16:53 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7GIGqfo008356; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:16:52 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7GIGpkM001663; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:16:52 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 82E26378196; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:16:51 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Chris Moller Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [tools-team] 11874 Vector pretty-printer chokes on bit-vectors References: <4C653282.4050204@redhat.com> <4C659A95.1060207@redhat.com> <4C695337.5030908@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4C695337.5030908@redhat.com> (Chris Moller's message of "Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:03:19 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Chris" == Chris Moller writes: Chris> If it's a sparse vector, yeah, you're right. But it's probably more Chris> trouble than it's worth to figure that out and do different things Chris> depending, and, on average, it probably dumps more chares to print the Chris> indices of the '1's than to print all of the bits. Sounds reasonable. For future reference, this is the wrong list for libstdc++ patches. I will forward this and apply it to gcc. Tom