From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 126004 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2015 16:26:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 125992 invoked by uid 89); 26 Oct 2015 16:26:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-pa0-f44.google.com Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com (HELO mail-pa0-f44.google.com) (209.85.220.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:26:18 +0000 Received: by pacfa8 with SMTP id fa8so13708276pac.0 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:26:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.68.129.228 with SMTP id nz4mr22980114pbb.41.1445876776635; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:26:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seba.sebabeach.org.gmail.com (173-13-178-53-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [173.13.178.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id yg2sm34777209pbb.79.2015.10.26.09.26.15 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:26:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Evans To: "Metzger\, Markus T" Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" , "palves\@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] btrace: change record instruction-history /m References: <1445246610-11645-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1445246610-11645-4-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <86y4eqczok.fsf@sspiff.org> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 21:15:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Markus T. Metzger's message of "Mon, 26 Oct 2015 08:17:26 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00573.txt.bz2 "Metzger, Markus T" writes: > That's exactly how it works. I added a detailed comment to > btrace_print_lines and a brief comment to btrace_insn_history. Thanks. > I'm waiting for your feedback on a better name for gdb_print_insn_tuple > before sending out v3. Done.