From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13889 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2010 14:36:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 13752 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Nov 2010 14:36:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:36:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oABEaNA6004337 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:36:23 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oABEaLQA020598; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:36:21 -0500 From: Phil Muldoon To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey , dan@codesourcery.com, eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: [patch] Add visible flag to breakpoints. References: <201010312107.38336.pedro@codesourcery.com> Reply-to: pmuldoon@redhat.com X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201010312107.38336.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:07:37 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00149.txt.bz2 > Pedro Alves writes: > Otherwise looks fine to me. Thanks. Thanks I fixed up the changes. Apologies for that spurious change noise. > Eli Zaretskii writes: > Then the documentation patch is okay with these changes. Thanks I fixed the documentation issues you noted. > Tom Tromey writes: > The Python parts look good to me. I added the changes that Pedro requested too. So committed, thanks Cheers, Phil