From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16213 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2010 15:54:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 16202 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jul 2010 15:54:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:54:38 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6MFsY6P024081 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:54:36 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6MFsX3p032504; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:54:33 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6MFsWK8011710; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:54:32 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id C36373797F3; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:54:31 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [0/4] RFC: add DWARF index support References: <20100722113141.GA30210@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:54:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20100722113141.GA30210@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:31:41 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00352.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> $d -> $dir Thanks. Jan> Also I would prefer removing the /dev/null redirection, normally Jan> GDB does not produce any message anyway. Suppressing messages by Jan> the caller is always easier than unsuppressing them. Sounds good. Tom