From: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] GDB test suite: Add helper for locating core files
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3r2u8fgis.fsf@oc1027705133.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a02b8961-d8c3-a0a9-9887-23a24e63962d@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Thu, 12 Oct 2017 14:47:19 +0100")
On Thu, Oct 12 2017, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 10/09/2017 07:46 PM, Andreas Arnez wrote:
>
>> @@ -5883,7 +5883,7 @@ proc run_and_get_core {binfile {arg ""}} {
>> # specified. Return that path name, or "" if no core file was found.
>>
>> proc find_core {binfile coredir {destcore ""}} {
>> - if {[is_remote target]} {
>> + if {![isnative]} {
>> warning "Can not access remote core file."
>> return ""
>> }
>
> This seems incorrect to me. "isnative" only checks
> if the build and target _triplets_ are the same. So
> foo-linux-gnu gdb x foo-linux-gnu gdbserver on separate
> machine still returns isnative==true.
Exactly, that's why I originally wrote is_remote instead. And I also
wondered why the core dump tests check isnative. Does anyone run the
testsuite on a native remote setup?
> I think the real problem is that the native-gdbserver board
> returns true to is_remote, when I think it shouldn't.
>
> Doing that alone results in fallout in the testsuite, of
> course. I'm seeing if fixing it is doable.
Right, this seems all a bit mixed up to me, similar to the confusing
remote_file and remote_exec operations in core_find.
--
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-12 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-18 18:42 [PATCH 0/2] GDB test suite: Support targets with systemd-coredump Andreas Arnez
2017-09-18 18:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] GDB test suite: Add helper for locating core files Andreas Arnez
2017-10-07 16:45 ` Kevin Buettner
2017-10-09 18:46 ` Andreas Arnez
2017-10-11 8:17 ` Kevin Buettner
2017-10-11 14:53 ` Andreas Arnez
2017-10-12 13:47 ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-12 16:48 ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-17 9:22 ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-12 17:00 ` Andreas Arnez [this message]
2017-10-13 9:28 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-10-13 10:56 ` Andreas Arnez
2017-10-17 13:58 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-10-17 10:06 ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-17 10:01 ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-17 18:21 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-10-18 11:46 ` Pedro Alves
2017-09-18 18:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] GDB test suite: Get core files on targets with systemd-coredump Andreas Arnez
2017-10-17 10:22 ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-17 17:37 ` Andreas Arnez
2017-10-17 18:09 ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-17 18:14 ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-17 18:17 ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-18 15:56 ` Andreas Arnez
2017-10-19 10:48 ` Pedro Alves
2017-10-23 13:41 ` Andreas Arnez
2017-10-23 14:30 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3r2u8fgis.fsf@oc1027705133.ibm.com \
--to=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).