From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Python Finish Breakpoints
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3r4zxdf4c.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111221065224.GA4120@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:52:24 +0400")
>>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> writes:
>> Great! I'll fix this last bits and commit it in the next few days
>> Is it okay for 7.4 branch as well ?
Joel> Tom asked me on IRC whether it would be OK for 7.4 as well, with
Joel> some doubts on his side. With the time difference, I wasn't there
Joel> anymore, so I thought I'd answer here. As always, if a Global
Joel> Maintainer (such as Tom) is confident about a given patch, that's
Joel> always good enough for me to put it in.
Joel> I'm not sure whether Tom was asking me to look at the patch and
Joel> make an evaluation myself. I skimmed the patch, and at first sight,
Joel> it seems big, and slightly intrusive (in the sense that it touches
Joel> several files, many of them critical to all platforms). My initial
Joel> impression, which would need a more careful read of your patch
Joel> to be confirmed, is that it might be a little risky to do so.
Joel> Tom: Just let me know if you'd like me to look at the patch more
Joel> in detail.
I was thinking about it last night, and I think it is ok to go in.
I think the changes outside of Python are pretty easily verified as
being safe.
As for the Python changes, if something is wrong in the implementation
of the new code -- well, it is a new feature, I think it won't break
anything existing.
So, I think it is ok for 7.4.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-21 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <BANLkTim+YH64zkWvdz2_kVUUj=AJ7v4LKw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTi=gtHzWzXOJzB+a19=jkfk1hGwQBg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTikVdqbMqjguTV8ct0TWiBDhHGYtLg@mail.gmail.com>
2011-05-11 7:44 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-05-11 10:31 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-05-11 11:29 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-05-12 10:38 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-05-12 10:50 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-05-12 11:29 ` Kevin Pouget
[not found] ` <BANLkTi=Eu-5B4YyhP2rGdQXgXbBN-EmLKA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTikt2hEUcXkGVH44NaUcwiF1SGdMaw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTi=UpgogckTD5MZsW+PC5d2F8X-+jA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTi==bj50mZgFKq_qA-+3-2CQA3tBVw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTimmYEmvKT_984jYEVZnA5RGFpEgNw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-05-19 16:21 ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-24 12:51 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-05-27 20:30 ` Tom Tromey
2011-05-30 9:29 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-13 14:34 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-20 20:12 ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-20 20:58 ` Tom Tromey
2011-10-21 8:15 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-24 11:43 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-24 13:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-24 14:30 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-24 17:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-24 15:31 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-24 16:27 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-10-25 11:05 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-25 11:37 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-10-25 12:22 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-28 8:33 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-28 20:51 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-02 14:44 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-11-04 14:25 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-11-04 21:04 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-09 14:10 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-11-16 10:53 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-11-17 17:49 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-17 17:48 ` Tom Tromey
[not found] ` <CAPftXUJwtGJhqFyfX6LVK87QH2xeLkvv5kx=yaEnYJMv0YR_rw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-11-24 8:27 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-11-30 16:02 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-02 21:49 ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-05 9:29 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-06 21:18 ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-07 13:35 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-08 15:30 ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-08 16:10 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-08 18:08 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-09 9:53 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-18 19:22 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-20 20:55 ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-20 20:58 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-21 7:16 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-12-21 17:13 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
[not found] ` <CAPftXUKXh9ekZ2kiwQ=5zbrjst+9VH9-eZk8h+Z-9SpQ1WqdLw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAPftXULQFggY3Nz2byC0fMZA1sg4Nymp3hAhe8aSuLNG4cauFg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAPftXUJALHd=-fajVwgowqfCDfXO6JMxSkorWD6CQArsg-PedQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAPftXULKC8gp3L87+PZEF3dj3crv9bh-uzZpRiYKjqEw_xyptQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-12-27 4:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-12-27 9:40 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-27 12:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-12-27 9:34 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-24 23:56 ` [patch] Fix gdb.python/py-finish-breakpoint.exp new FAIL on x86_64-m32 [Re: [RFC] Python Finish Breakpoints] Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-27 11:13 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-12-27 21:39 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-04 17:45 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-04 17:58 ` [commit 7.4] " Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-04 18:10 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-12-26 11:28 ` [patch] Fix remote.c crash on gdbserver close (+fix py-finish-breakpoint.exp for gdbserver) " Jan Kratochvil
2011-12-27 23:30 ` [patch] Fix remote.c crash on gdbserver close (+fix py-finish-breakpoint.exp for gdbserver) [rediff] Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-02 17:57 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-02 19:49 ` Pedro Alves
2012-01-19 16:24 ` Call target_close after unpushing, not before (was: Re: [patch] Fix remote.c crash on gdbserver close (+fix py-finish-breakpoint.exp for gdbserver)) Pedro Alves
2012-01-19 16:27 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-19 16:37 ` Call target_close after unpushing, not before Pedro Alves
2012-01-19 16:53 ` [commit] Re: Call target_close after unpushing, not before (was: Re: [patch] Fix remote.c crash on gdbserver close (+fix py-finish-breakpoint.exp for gdbserver)) Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-04 14:49 ` [RFC] Python Finish Breakpoints Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-04 15:24 ` Kevin Pouget
2012-01-04 16:29 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-04 16:42 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-04 16:40 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-04 17:13 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-01-09 9:21 ` Kevin Pouget
2012-01-27 17:01 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-28 19:26 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3r4zxdf4c.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=kevin.pouget@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).