From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27639 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2010 21:46:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 27630 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Oct 2010 21:46:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:46:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95LkFVc025959 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Oct 2010 17:46:15 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95LkEk6014938; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 17:46:15 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95LkDak023337; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 17:46:14 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 733F1379C1A; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:46:13 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: "H.J. Lu" , GDB Subject: Re: PATCH: Set MAX_REGISTER_SIZE to 64 References: <20100913170907.GA25598@intel.com> <20100930182219.GB6213@adacore.com> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20100930182219.GB6213@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:22:19 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: >> * defs.h (MAX_REGISTER_SIZE): Set to 64. Joel> In the meantime, seems OK to me (for HEAD). I'm OK with putting Joel> this in 7.2, but I'd like the OK from another maintainer before Joel> you put it in 7.2, just to be on the safe side [1]. I think that would be fine. >From a little looking around there don't seem to be many bad effects from bumping this. Mostly it seems to be used to size arrays on the stack. Joel> [1]: It's still unclear whether there will be another release off Joel> the 7.2 branch. I think something to be re-evaluated later, Joel> around Oct/Nov. Perhaps we can informally talk about it at Joel> the GCC Summit? Sounds good to me. I think we should have a BOF or something, but I haven't yet looked into setting it up. Tom