From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27641 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2011 16:35:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 27393 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Feb 2011 16:35:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:35:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p14GYxIK012966 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:34:59 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p14GYwtI019189; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:34:59 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p14GYwke007063; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:34:58 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 13BC63784E1; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:34:58 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: Vladimir Simonov , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb: Incorrect stack unwinding if compressed debug info is used References: <1296238472.3009.ezmlm@sourceware.org> <4D46D872.6080407@sw.ru> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Paul Pluzhnikov's message of "Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:55:00 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Pluzhnikov writes: Paul> I am curious how your GDB avoids dwarf2_read_section(). As far as Paul> I can tell, it should always be called (indirectly) by Paul> dwarf2_initialize_objfile(). I am going to guess that you are looking at a gdb from before the lazy section reading patch went in. Tom