From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23070 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2019 17:24:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22932 invoked by uid 89); 10 Oct 2019 17:24:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:623 X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.158.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:24:25 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9AH7lfH022603 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 13:24:18 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vj8s1gg71-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 13:24:17 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 18:24:16 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 10 Oct 2019 18:24:12 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x9AHOBxR53412086 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:24:12 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C644C058; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:24:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7044C04A; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:24:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc0404454431.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.222.48]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:24:11 +0000 (GMT) From: Andreas Arnez To: Tom de Vries Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Alan Hayward , Andrew Burgess Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: Fix typos in infcall-nested-structs.c References: <87lfttdcmv.fsf@tromey.com> <7004ea74-1aeb-112c-ee24-a0042423e0a4@suse.de> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:24:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <7004ea74-1aeb-112c-ee24-a0042423e0a4@suse.de> (Tom de Vries's message of "Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:23:51 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain x-cbid: 19101017-0020-0000-0000-00000377EDED X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19101017-0021-0000-0000-000021CDFB83 Message-Id: X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg00281.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 10 2019, Tom de Vries wrote: > I see these new failures on x86_64-linux: > ... > FAIL: gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.exp: l=c++: types-tc-tf: p/d > check_arg_struct_02_01 (ref_val_struct_02_01) > FAIL: gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.exp: l=c++: types-ts-tf: p/d > check_arg_struct_02_01 (ref_val_struct_02_01) > FAIL: gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.exp: l=c++: types-ti-tf: p/d > check_arg_struct_02_01 (ref_val_struct_02_01) > ... Maybe the test case caught a real bug then, right? Or do you see a problem with the test case? -- Andreas