* Re: [RFC] display names of explicit typedefs for 'info types'
[not found] <37197.5782713436$1277308354@news.gmane.org>
@ 2010-06-24 16:56 ` Tom Tromey
2010-06-25 7:36 ` Pierre Muller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2010-06-24 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pierre Muller; +Cc: gdb-patches
>>>>> "Pierre" == Pierre Muller <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> writes:
Pierre> I was always puzzled by the fact that info types
Pierre> did sometime not list types that I knew existed.
Pierre> The problem is that for types defined in C using `typedef '
Pierre> only the definition part was displayed, but not the name of
Pierre> the type itself.
Thanks for finding this.
Pierre> (gdb) ptype my
Pierre> type = int
Pierre> Here again, the original typedef name is completely lost ...
I think this is expected. You can see the typedef if you use 'whatis'
instead:
(gdb) whatis my
type = myint
Pierre> 2010-06-22 Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Pierre> * c-typeprint.c (c_print_typedef): Append new type name for
Pierre> typedefs.
This is ok. Thanks.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [RFC] display names of explicit typedefs for 'info types'
2010-06-24 16:56 ` [RFC] display names of explicit typedefs for 'info types' Tom Tromey
@ 2010-06-25 7:36 ` Pierre Muller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pierre Muller @ 2010-06-25 7:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tromey; +Cc: gdb-patches
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Tom Tromey
> Envoyé : Thursday, June 24, 2010 6:37 PM
> À : Pierre Muller
> Cc : gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Objet : Re: [RFC] display names of explicit typedefs for 'info types'
>
> >>>>> "Pierre" == Pierre Muller <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
> writes:
>
> Pierre> I was always puzzled by the fact that info types
> Pierre> did sometime not list types that I knew existed.
> Pierre> The problem is that for types defined in C using `typedef '
> Pierre> only the definition part was displayed, but not the name of
> Pierre> the type itself.
>
> Thanks for finding this.
>
> Pierre> (gdb) ptype my
> Pierre> type = int
> Pierre> Here again, the original typedef name is completely lost ...
>
> I think this is expected. You can see the typedef if you use 'whatis'
> instead:
>
> (gdb) whatis my
> type = myint
>
> Pierre> 2010-06-22 Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
> Pierre> * c-typeprint.c (c_print_typedef): Append new type name
> for
> Pierre> typedefs.
>
> This is ok. Thanks.
Thanks for the approval,
patch committed in:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-06/msg00167.html
Pierre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] display names of explicit typedefs for 'info types'
2010-06-23 15:52 Pierre Muller
@ 2010-06-23 16:58 ` Michael Snyder
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2010-06-23 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pierre Muller; +Cc: gdb-patches
Pierre Muller wrote:
> I was always puzzled by the fact that info types
> did sometime not list types that I knew existed.
> The problem is that for types defined in C using `typedef '
> only the definition part was displayed, but not the name of
> the type itself.
>
> This small patch fixes that 'mis-feature'...
> I was expecting lots of failures in the testsuite,
> but was surprised to find no change that I could relate to the patch...
>
> The following tiny example:
>>>>>> Start
> typedef volatile int volint;
> typedef int myint;
>
> volint vol;
> myint my;
>
> int
> main ()
> {
> vol = 5;
> my = 8;
> return 0;
> }
>>>>>> End
>
> gives currently (compiled with stabs debug info)
> typedef int; (Repeated twice)
> typedef volatile int;
>
> With the patch, I get:
> typedef int;
> typedef int myint;
> typedef volatile int volint;
>
> Note that the output of 'info var' is not really consistent:
> (gdb) info var
> myint my;
> volatile int vol;
> but this is not changed by my patch, and is the same as before..
> (gdb) ptype my
> type = int
> Here again, the original typedef name is completely lost ...
>
> Comments welcome,
>
> Pierre Muller
> Pascal language support maintainer for GDB
I think it's an incremental improvement.
>
> 2010-06-22 Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
>
> * c-typeprint.c (c_print_typedef): Append new type name for
> typedefs.
>
> Index: src/gdb/c-typeprint.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/c-typeprint.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.58
> diff -u -p -r1.58 c-typeprint.c
> --- src/gdb/c-typeprint.c 21 Jun 2010 18:01:50 -0000 1.58
> +++ src/gdb/c-typeprint.c 22 Jun 2010 22:36:06 -0000
> @@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ c_print_typedef (struct type *type, stru
> type_print (type, "", stream, 0);
> if (TYPE_NAME ((SYMBOL_TYPE (new_symbol))) == 0
> || strcmp (TYPE_NAME ((SYMBOL_TYPE (new_symbol))),
> - SYMBOL_LINKAGE_NAME (new_symbol)) != 0)
> + SYMBOL_LINKAGE_NAME (new_symbol)) != 0
> + || TYPE_CODE (SYMBOL_TYPE (new_symbol)) == TYPE_CODE_TYPEDEF)
> fprintf_filtered (stream, " %s", SYMBOL_PRINT_NAME (new_symbol));
> fprintf_filtered (stream, ";\n");
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [RFC] display names of explicit typedefs for 'info types'
@ 2010-06-23 15:52 Pierre Muller
2010-06-23 16:58 ` Michael Snyder
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pierre Muller @ 2010-06-23 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
I was always puzzled by the fact that info types
did sometime not list types that I knew existed.
The problem is that for types defined in C using `typedef '
only the definition part was displayed, but not the name of
the type itself.
This small patch fixes that 'mis-feature'...
I was expecting lots of failures in the testsuite,
but was surprised to find no change that I could relate to the patch...
The following tiny example:
>>>>>Start
typedef volatile int volint;
typedef int myint;
volint vol;
myint my;
int
main ()
{
vol = 5;
my = 8;
return 0;
}
>>>>>End
gives currently (compiled with stabs debug info)
typedef int; (Repeated twice)
typedef volatile int;
With the patch, I get:
typedef int;
typedef int myint;
typedef volatile int volint;
Note that the output of 'info var' is not really consistent:
(gdb) info var
myint my;
volatile int vol;
but this is not changed by my patch, and is the same as before..
(gdb) ptype my
type = int
Here again, the original typedef name is completely lost ...
Comments welcome,
Pierre Muller
Pascal language support maintainer for GDB
2010-06-22 Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
* c-typeprint.c (c_print_typedef): Append new type name for
typedefs.
Index: src/gdb/c-typeprint.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/c-typeprint.c,v
retrieving revision 1.58
diff -u -p -r1.58 c-typeprint.c
--- src/gdb/c-typeprint.c 21 Jun 2010 18:01:50 -0000 1.58
+++ src/gdb/c-typeprint.c 22 Jun 2010 22:36:06 -0000
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ c_print_typedef (struct type *type, stru
type_print (type, "", stream, 0);
if (TYPE_NAME ((SYMBOL_TYPE (new_symbol))) == 0
|| strcmp (TYPE_NAME ((SYMBOL_TYPE (new_symbol))),
- SYMBOL_LINKAGE_NAME (new_symbol)) != 0)
+ SYMBOL_LINKAGE_NAME (new_symbol)) != 0
+ || TYPE_CODE (SYMBOL_TYPE (new_symbol)) == TYPE_CODE_TYPEDEF)
fprintf_filtered (stream, " %s", SYMBOL_PRINT_NAME (new_symbol));
fprintf_filtered (stream, ";\n");
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-25 7:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <37197.5782713436$1277308354@news.gmane.org>
2010-06-24 16:56 ` [RFC] display names of explicit typedefs for 'info types' Tom Tromey
2010-06-25 7:36 ` Pierre Muller
2010-06-23 15:52 Pierre Muller
2010-06-23 16:58 ` Michael Snyder
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).