From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-75689-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11246 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2010 19:17:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 11231 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Sep 2010 19:17:56 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:17:52 +0000
Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8MJHRIf013488	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:17:27 -0400
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])	by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8MJHReI017456;	Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:17:27 -0400
Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8MJHPBs026178;	Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:17:26 -0400
Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500)	id B3C8C378875; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:17:25 -0600 (MDT)
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFA: fix PR python/11792
References: <m3pqwzj1cf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83pqwzkeyi.fsf@gnu.org>	<m3wrr58501.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83zkw0j15r.fsf@gnu.org>	<m31v9c88di.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83y6bkhy8d.fsf@gnu.org>	<m3zkvtwfq2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83fwx2w37j.fsf@gnu.org>	<m34odhagbw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83y6atve9j.fsf@gnu.org>	<20100922182504.GA3007@adacore.com> <83wrqdvcup.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:26:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <83wrqdvcup.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 22 Sep	2010 20:42:54 +0200")
Message-ID: <m3zkv97flm.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00384.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

Eli> Yes.  We are also supposed to humor the responsible maintainer when
Eli> she asks for some simple change as part of the review process.

That is no reason to ignore the agreed-upon rules.

In this case I did not read your message as a request.  I saw it as a
conditional suggestion, which I chose not to take.

Tom