From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20827 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2010 22:15:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 20813 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Aug 2010 22:15:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:15:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7BMFGEp012939 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:15:16 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7BMFGfo026781; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:15:16 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7BMFFBu028594; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:15:15 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id F1B373781C7; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:15:14 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Michael Snyder Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: RFA: implement "watch -location" References: <4C632000.2060606@vmware.com> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:15:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4C632000.2060606@vmware.com> (Michael Snyder's message of "Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:11:12 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Snyder writes: Michael> Syntax quibble. "-location"? Don't we traditionally use Michael> command option syntax such as "print /x"? Hate to be Michael> inconsistant... I picked that because it is what Apple did. GDB itself is inconsistent. The "/x" form is used (primarily? by formats), but the "-" form is used too, e.g. "file -readnow". Michael> Also, what about help? Did I miss it? I couldn't see it at a glance. Oops! I'll fix this. Thanks. Tom