From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 69460 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2018 07:05:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 69447 invoked by uid 89); 9 Aug 2018 07:05:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.suse.de Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:05:06 +0000 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0D2ADC2; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 07:05:04 +0000 (UTC) From: Andreas Schwab To: Jim Wilson Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Tom Tromey , Palmer Dabbelt , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] RISC-V: Add configure support riscv*-linux*. References: <878t5gjv94.fsf@tromey.com> <83600kp8pc.fsf@gnu.org> X-Yow: It's the RINSE CYCLE!! They've ALL IGNORED the RINSE CYCLE!! Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:05:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Jim Wilson's message of "Wed, 8 Aug 2018 20:43:20 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2018-08/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2 On Aug 08 2018, Jim Wilson wrote: > I've been looking at the riscv{32,64} bfd support. Since configuring > for riscv32 enables riscv64 support also, and riscv64 requires 64-bit > support, this means that there is no riscv bfd support at all when > using --disable-64-bit-bfd --enable-targets=all. Isn't that enforced by want64 in bfd/config.bfd? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."