From: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide Solaris 11 buildbots
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 08:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yddo9c8230f.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lg7owe0m.fsf@redhat.com> (Sergio Durigan Junior's message of "Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:04:57 -0400")
Hi Sergio,
>>> I'll enable the email notifications for both builders later today.
>>
>> excellent, thanks.
it would be great if you could do this: last night Tom's series of
-Wshadow=local patches broke the Solaris build, which didn't trigger a
gdb-patches mail, thus easily going unnoticed.
>> I had a look at the current set of build warnings and wondered what (if
>> any) to do about them:
>>
>> ../../binutils-gdb/libiberty/pex-unix.c:612:7: warning: ‘vfork’ is
>> deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
>>
>> Solaris 11 has deprecated vfork. vfork(2) suggests to replace uses by
>> posix_spawn or posix_spawnp, but this is something to take up with the
>> libiberty maintainers.
>
> Yes, you should get in touch with the GCC/libiberty maintainers.
I certainly will.
>> checking whether a statically linked program can dlopen itself... Setting
>> warning flags = -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
>> -Wshadow -Wstack-usage=262144 -Werror
>> Setting warning flags = -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
>> -Wshadow -Wstack-usage=262144 -Werror
>> checking compiler warning flags... -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wno-unused
>> -Wunused-value -Wunused-variable -Wunused-function -Wno-switch
>> -Wno-char-subscripts -Wempty-body -Wunused-but-set-parameter
>> -Wunused-but-set-variable -Wno-sign-compare
>> -Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized -Wsuggest-override
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 -Wduplicated-cond -Wno-unknown-pragmas
>> -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Werror
>>
>> Those are all spurious, sometimes two different lines running into each
>> other.
>
> This happens because of the parallel build.
True, but even so the 'Setting warning flags' line counts as a warning ;-)
>> /opt/gdb-buildbot/home/solaris11-sparcv9/solaris11-sparcv9-m64/build/gdb/../../binutils-gdb/gdb/c-exp.y:
>> warning: 42 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
>> /opt/gdb-buildbot/home/solaris11-sparcv9/solaris11-sparcv9-m64/build/gdb/../../binutils-gdb/gdb/c-exp.y:
>> warning: 53 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
>> /opt/gdb-buildbot/home/solaris11-sparcv9/solaris11-sparcv9-m64/build/gdb/../../binutils-gdb/gdb/m2-exp.y:
>> warning: 34 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
>> /opt/gdb-buildbot/home/solaris11-sparcv9/solaris11-sparcv9-m64/build/gdb/../../binutils-gdb/gdb/m2-exp.y:301.25-44:
>> warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
>>
>> Those are from the bundled bison 3.0.4 and again also present on
>> Fedora. One could silence them with -Wno-conflicts-sr if need be, but
>> that would require testing if the yacc/bison used supports those
>> options.
>>
>> bison 2.4.2 only emits
>>
>> conflicts: 42 shift/reduce, 53 reduce/reduce
>> conflicts: 34 shift/reduce
>
> They happen on pretty much every builder. I personally don't think
> these should be silenced.
Probably not, though if the conflicts are as expected it would be nice
they didn't trigger a warning.
>> ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/coffread.c:1104:36: warning: ‘newobj’ may be used
>> uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>>
>> Seems legit.
>
> Should be easy to fix.
Indeed: Tom already beat me to it.
>> ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/inferior.h:567:26: warning: ‘*((void*)(&
>> maybe_restore_inferior)+40).scoped_restore_current_inferior::m_saved_inf’
>> may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>> ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/progspace.h:285:31: warning: ‘*((void*)(&
>> maybe_restore_inferior)+32).scoped_restore_current_program_space::m_saved_pspace’
>> may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>> ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/ui-out.h:197:18: warning:
>> ‘asm_list.ui_out_emit_type<(ui_out_type)1>::m_uiout’ may be used
>> uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>>
>> Those three could be legit, but I cannot tell. I suspect they don't
>> occur on other builders because they use older gcc versions (e.g. gcc
>> 4.8) while the Solaris builders use gcc 7.3.
>
> ISTR seeing these in other builders as well. If I'm not mistaken, they
> have to do with a GCC issue about std::optional or some such.
Right: this is under discussion in another thread right now.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-05 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-19 11:23 Rainer Orth
2018-09-19 19:46 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-09-20 12:35 ` Rainer Orth
2018-09-20 14:10 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-09-20 14:40 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-09-20 14:44 ` Rainer Orth
2018-09-20 14:50 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-09-20 17:55 ` Rainer Orth
2018-09-24 14:43 ` Rainer Orth
2018-09-24 15:25 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-09-26 13:16 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-09-26 13:33 ` Rainer Orth
2018-09-26 14:05 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-05 8:48 ` Rainer Orth [this message]
2018-10-05 15:36 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-09-21 8:51 ` Rainer Orth
2018-09-21 15:31 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yddo9c8230f.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE \
--to=ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).