Re: c++/1091: Constructor breakpoints ignored

Re: c++/1091: Constructor breakpoints ignored

[drow]

Synopsis: Constructor breakpoints ignored

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: drow
State-Changed-When: Thu Oct 11 19:55:20 2007
State-Changed-Why:
    This is fixed in GDB HEAD.  It is not included in GDB 6.7, but will be in the next release.

http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=1091

Re: c++/1091: Constructor breakpoints ignored

[Woody LaRue]

The following reply was made to PR c++/1091; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Woody LaRue" <larue@cadence.com>
To: <gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/1091: Constructor breakpoints ignored
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:42:09 -0700

  This problem is impacting the systemC (www.systemc.org) community, and
  other C++ developers. Is there a fix in the works?

Re: c++/1091: Constructor breakpoints ignored

[Sev Binello]

The following reply was made to PR c++/1091; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Sev Binello <sev@bnl.gov>
To: gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com,  nobody@sources.redhat.com, 
 eswierk@kealia.com,  gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/1091: Constructor breakpoints ignored
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:30:49 -0500

 Is this still a problem with gdb 6.3, almost 2 years later ????????
 
 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=1091 
 
 

c++/1091: Constructor breakpoints ignored

[eswierk]

>Number:         1091
>Category:       c++
>Synopsis:       Constructor breakpoints ignored
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Feb 25 02:38:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     eswierk@kealia.com
>Release:        5.3
>Organization:
>Environment:
Red Hat Linux 8.0; g++ 3.2.1; DWARF-2
>Description:
gdb allows setting breakpoints within an object constructor, but these breakpoints are frequently ignored.  This seems to happen less frequently with inline constructors.

For more info see http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2002-12/msg00309.html and followups.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: