From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2972 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2008 16:28:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 2954 invoked by uid 71); 12 Aug 2008 16:28:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080812162802.2953.qmail@sourceware.org> To: nobody@sources.redhat.com Cc: gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com, From: Jeremy Bennett Subject: Re: gdb/2500: Read watchpoints do not behave correctly Reply-To: Jeremy Bennett Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q3/txt/msg00067.txt.bz2 The following reply was made to PR gdb/2500; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jeremy Bennett To: gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com?Subject=Re%3A%20gdb%2F2500%3A%20Read%20watchpoints%20do%20not%20behave%20correctly Cc: Subject: Re: gdb/2500: Read watchpoints do not behave correctly Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:25:05 +0100 I have now tried the suggested fix for the OpenRISC 1000, and it cures the problem in example 2. It's not clear to me how to fix the problem with Intel in example 1. Arguably over-enthusiastic reporting is less of an issue than under-enthusiastic reporting (within reason!!!!) Jeremy -- Tel: +44 (1202) 416955 Cell: +44 (7970) 676050 SkypeID: jeremybennett Email: jeremy.bennett@embecosm.com Web: www.embecosm.com