public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pedro at codesourcery dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug macros/9748] macros containing __extension__ won't run
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090115233941.13105.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090115210626.9748.rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>


------- Additional Comments From pedro at codesourcery dot com  2009-01-15 23:39 -------
Subject: Re:  macros containing __extension__ won't run

On Thursday 15 January 2009 21:40:25, drow at false dot org wrote:

> Also on statement expressions, which is what the __extension__ marker
> is for in the first place :-)

IIRC, the __extensions__ marker is for enabling
gnu-C-isms no matter the C dialect or e.g., if -pedantic is selected,
so it's for more things, but, yeah, missed that.  :-)

> I don't think statement expressions are likely to be implemented in
> GDB.  It currently has only a C expression parser, with no support for
> statements etc.

Stating the obvious, you can override the checked versions
in gdb expressions with:

 (gdb) macro define TREE_CHECK(T, CODE) (T)

If wanting to retain the checking ability when called from gdb,
perhaps the best would be to still override the whole TREE_CHECK macro
with macro define, retaining close enough semantics.  Say, add
something like this and similars to gcc:

 const_tree
 gdb_tree_check (const_tree __t, int code)
 {
   if (TREE_CODE (__t) != code)
     tree_check_failed (__t, "<gdb>", 0, "<nofunction>", code); // or call some other variant
   return __t;
 }

And this in .gdbinit:

 macro define TREE_CHECK(T, CODE) gdb_tree_check(T, CODE)



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9748

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-15 23:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-15 21:06 [Bug macros/9748] New: " rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-15 21:30 ` [Bug macros/9748] " pedro at codesourcery dot com
2009-01-15 21:40 ` drow at false dot org
2009-01-15 23:39 ` pedro at codesourcery dot com [this message]
2009-01-16  0:05 ` tromey at redhat dot com
     [not found] <bug-9748-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2011-06-28  9:11 ` jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
2013-03-04 18:13 ` tromey at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090115233941.13105.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).