public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "vaurora at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug breakpoints/9723] gdb breakpoints silently fail on PIE binaries
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090117003518.9358.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090109175536.9723.vaurora@redhat.com>


------- Additional Comments From vaurora at redhat dot com  2009-01-17 00:35 -------
So I don't consider myself a beginning computer user and this still feels like a
bug to me.  Forget the crash in vendor-specific code; with vanilla gdb I set a
breakpoint, it appears to succeed, and then, well, it just doesn't work.

Until such time as PIE support is merged, perhaps gdb could print some sort of
informational message or fail the breakpoint or give some indication that the
expected behavior is that the breakpoint will not be triggered.  It would at
least cut down on the number of duplicate bugs filed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |
            Summary|gdb core dumps on adding a  |gdb breakpoints silently
                   |breakpoint                  |fail on PIE binaries


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9723

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-17  0:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-09 17:55 [Bug breakpoints/9723] New: gdb core dumps on adding a breakpoint vaurora at redhat dot com
2009-01-09 18:01 ` [Bug breakpoints/9723] " pedro at codesourcery dot com
2009-01-09 18:02 ` pedro at codesourcery dot com
2009-01-09 20:00 ` vaurora at redhat dot com
2009-01-09 20:48 ` pedro at codesourcery dot com
2009-01-12 19:26 ` pedro at codesourcery dot com
2009-01-12 19:29 ` pedro at codesourcery dot com
2009-01-12 21:50 ` pedro at codesourcery dot com
2009-01-16 21:27 ` vaurora at redhat dot com
2009-01-16 22:00 ` drow at sources dot redhat dot com
2009-01-16 22:42 ` pedro at codesourcery dot com
2009-01-17  0:35 ` vaurora at redhat dot com [this message]
2009-04-04 21:37 ` [Bug breakpoints/9723] gdb breakpoints silently fail on PIE binaries bauermann at sourceware dot org
2009-07-27 23:22 ` bauermann at sourceware dot org
2009-08-04 20:47 ` bauermann at sourceware dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090117003518.9358.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).