public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug gdb/9979] New: DW_OP_value not supported
@ 2009-03-21 22:58 hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-22 0:00 ` [Bug gdb/9979] " tromey at redhat dot com
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-21 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
DW_OP_value would be very useful in GCC to output debug info for this pointers
of inlined methods where the actual address was optimized out.
--
Summary: DW_OP_value not supported
Product: gdb
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: gdb
AssignedTo: unassigned at sourceware dot org
ReportedBy: hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9979
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/9979] DW_OP_value not supported
2009-03-21 22:58 [Bug gdb/9979] New: DW_OP_value not supported hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-22 0:00 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2009-03-22 0:19 ` drow at false dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2009-03-22 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
------- Additional Comments From tromey at redhat dot com 2009-03-22 00:00 -------
Yeah -- but I don't think DW_OP_value is in any released standard.
I guess we could make DW_OP_GNU_value in the meantime, depending
on how urgent this is.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tromey at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9979
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/9979] DW_OP_value not supported
2009-03-21 22:58 [Bug gdb/9979] New: DW_OP_value not supported hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-22 0:00 ` [Bug gdb/9979] " tromey at redhat dot com
@ 2009-03-22 0:19 ` drow at false dot org
2009-06-10 19:07 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: drow at false dot org @ 2009-03-22 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
------- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2009-03-22 00:19 -------
Subject: Re: DW_OP_value not supported
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 12:00:18AM -0000, tromey at redhat dot com wrote:
> Yeah -- but I don't think DW_OP_value is in any released standard.
> I guess we could make DW_OP_GNU_value in the meantime, depending
> on how urgent this is.
I think it's reasonable to take the value in the draft at this point;
it's marked as accepted, and while it could conceivably be backed out
(in fact it obsoleted an earlier extension to DWARF3), I don't think
it's likely. My two cents.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9979
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/9979] DW_OP_value not supported
2009-03-21 22:58 [Bug gdb/9979] New: DW_OP_value not supported hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-22 0:00 ` [Bug gdb/9979] " tromey at redhat dot com
2009-03-22 0:19 ` drow at false dot org
@ 2009-06-10 19:07 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-06-10 20:38 ` tromey at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-06-10 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2009-06-10 19:07 -------
According to jakub, these may be the values:
DW_OP_implicit_value 0x9e
DW_OP_stack_value 0x9f
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fche at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9979
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/9979] DW_OP_value not supported
2009-03-21 22:58 [Bug gdb/9979] New: DW_OP_value not supported hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-06-10 19:07 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-06-10 20:38 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2009-06-20 16:38 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2009-09-14 15:57 ` tromey at redhat dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2009-06-10 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
------- Additional Comments From tromey at redhat dot com 2009-06-10 20:38 -------
Handy pointers:
http://www.dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=070426.1&type=closed3
http://www.dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=071227.1&type=closed3
Apparently DW_OP_value was renamed DW_OP_stack_value.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-06-10 20:38:37
date| |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9979
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/9979] DW_OP_value not supported
2009-03-21 22:58 [Bug gdb/9979] New: DW_OP_value not supported hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-06-10 20:38 ` tromey at redhat dot com
@ 2009-06-20 16:38 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2009-09-14 15:57 ` tromey at redhat dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2009-06-20 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
------- Additional Comments From tromey at redhat dot com 2009-06-20 16:37 -------
Working on a patch.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at sourceware dot|tromey at redhat dot com
|org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2009-06-10 20:38:37 |2009-06-20 16:37:59
date| |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9979
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/9979] DW_OP_value not supported
2009-03-21 22:58 [Bug gdb/9979] New: DW_OP_value not supported hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-06-20 16:38 ` tromey at redhat dot com
@ 2009-09-14 15:57 ` tromey at redhat dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2009-09-14 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
------- Additional Comments From tromey at redhat dot com 2009-09-14 15:57 -------
I checked in the fix.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|6.8 |6.9
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9979
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-14 15:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-21 22:58 [Bug gdb/9979] New: DW_OP_value not supported hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-22 0:00 ` [Bug gdb/9979] " tromey at redhat dot com
2009-03-22 0:19 ` drow at false dot org
2009-06-10 19:07 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-06-10 20:38 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2009-06-20 16:38 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2009-09-14 15:57 ` tromey at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).