From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29999 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2009 03:09:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 29973 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2009 03:09:04 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20091011030904.29972.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "msnyder at vmware dot com" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20090923122042.10689.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> References: <20090923122042.10689.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug backtrace/10689] replay mode should not or only optionally enter code executed by call() X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q4/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From msnyder at vmware dot com 2009-10-11 03:09 ------- Subject: Re: replay mode should not or only optionally enter code executed by call() teawater at gmail dot com wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From teawater at gmail dot com 2009-10-10 02:42 ------- > I think add a switch for prec to close record in call() can handle it. > > Do you think it's OK? > > Michael, what do you think about it? Well, this actually brings up a number of related questions. What if, during the recording, the user makes changes such as: * Change memory * Change registers * Change the course of execution, eg. by - change the PC - "jump" command - "call" command I think if user changes memory or registers, you record that. Right? And if user changes PC, or uses "jump" command, we will record it also, right? So in that case, it seems like we should also record the "call" command. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10689 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.