public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/11836] New: gdb cannot access variables that are subject to return value optimization
@ 2010-07-23 10:47 andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com
  2010-07-23 10:48 ` [Bug c++/11836] " andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com @ 2010-07-23 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

#include <string>

std::string foo()
{
    std::string s;
    s = "hello";
    s += "world";
    return s;
}

std::string bar()
{
    std::string s;
    s = "hello";
    s += "world";
    return "something else";
}

int main()
{
    int a = foo().size();
    int b = bar().size();
    return a + b;
}

/*

Gcc seems to apply return value optimization (even at -O0) but there is
some problem with either the generated debug information or the way
gdb handles it. 

To reproduce it, save this file here as rvo.cpp and run

    g++ -g -O0 rvo.cpp -o rvo 

    gdb -ex 'set confirm off' -ex 'file ./rvo' \
        -ex 'b rvo.cpp:8' -ex 'b rvo.cpp:16' \
        -ex 'run' -ex 'print s'  \
        -ex 'cont' -ex 'print s' \
        -ex 'quit'


The result will look like:

    Breakpoint 1, foo () at rvo.cpp:8
    8           s += "world";
    $1 = {static npos = <optimized out>, 
      _M_dataplus = {<std::allocator<char>> = {<__gnu_cxx::new_allocator<char>>
    = {<No daa fields>}, <No data fields>}, _M_p = 0x1 <Address 0x1 out of
    bounds>}}

    Breakpoint 2, bar () at rvo.cpp:16
    16          s += "world";
    $2 = {static npos = <optimized out>, 
      _M_dataplus = {<std::allocator<char>> = {<__gnu_cxx::new_allocator<char>>
    = {<No data fields>}, <No data fields>}, _M_p = 0x804b014 "hello"}}

    Program exited with code 030.

RVO seems to be applied in the first case with "dangling" debug information.
If no RVO is used (second case), all is fine.


*/

-- 
           Summary: gdb cannot access variables that are subject to return
                    value optimization
           Product: gdb
           Version: 7.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com
                CC: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
 GCC build triplet: i486-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: i486-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i486-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11836

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/11836] gdb cannot access variables that are subject to return value optimization
  2010-07-23 10:47 [Bug c++/11836] New: gdb cannot access variables that are subject to return value optimization andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com
@ 2010-07-23 10:48 ` andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com
  2010-07-23 14:54 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com @ 2010-07-23 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs


------- Additional Comments From andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com  2010-07-23 10:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=4882)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4882&action=view)
Test code and build instructions


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11836

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/11836] gdb cannot access variables that are subject to return value optimization
  2010-07-23 10:47 [Bug c++/11836] New: gdb cannot access variables that are subject to return value optimization andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com
  2010-07-23 10:48 ` [Bug c++/11836] " andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com
@ 2010-07-23 14:54 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
  2010-07-23 16:43 ` andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com
  2010-07-23 16:46 ` tromey at redhat dot com
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: swagiaal at redhat dot com @ 2010-07-23 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2010-07-23 14:54 -------
Andre,

Thanks for the nice test case. 's' seems to have a location in the debug info
but it is either wrong or gdb is reading it wrong. I'll take a look at this when
I get a chance. If anyone else is interested, in the mean while, go for it :)

Sami

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |swagiaal at redhat dot com
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11836

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/11836] gdb cannot access variables that are subject to return value optimization
  2010-07-23 10:47 [Bug c++/11836] New: gdb cannot access variables that are subject to return value optimization andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com
  2010-07-23 10:48 ` [Bug c++/11836] " andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com
  2010-07-23 14:54 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
@ 2010-07-23 16:43 ` andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com
  2010-07-23 16:46 ` tromey at redhat dot com
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com @ 2010-07-23 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs


------- Additional Comments From andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com  2010-07-23 16:43 -------

It turns out it is known on the gcc side: 

  http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44731

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11836

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/11836] gdb cannot access variables that are subject to return value optimization
  2010-07-23 10:47 [Bug c++/11836] New: gdb cannot access variables that are subject to return value optimization andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-07-23 16:43 ` andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com
@ 2010-07-23 16:46 ` tromey at redhat dot com
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2010-07-23 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs


------- Additional Comments From tromey at redhat dot com  2010-07-23 16:46 -------
Possibly this gcc bug:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44731

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tromey at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11836

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-23 16:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-23 10:47 [Bug c++/11836] New: gdb cannot access variables that are subject to return value optimization andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com
2010-07-23 10:48 ` [Bug c++/11836] " andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com
2010-07-23 14:54 ` swagiaal at redhat dot com
2010-07-23 16:43 ` andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com
2010-07-23 16:46 ` tromey at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).