[Bug gdb/10760] Process record doesn't support instruction 0xf11

[Bug gdb/10760] Process record doesn't support instruction 0xf11

[sergiodj at redhat dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10760

Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sergiodj at redhat dot com

--- Comment #5 from Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com> ---
Hi Simon, did you have the chance to try a newer GDB, as Hui asked?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gdb/10760] Process record doesn't support instruction 0xf11

[teawater at gmail dot com]

------- Additional Comments From teawater at gmail dot com  2010-06-23 13:49 -------
Hi,

Could you help me try the issue with gdb-cvs-head?
I think it is fixed in head.

Thanks,
Hui

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10760

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug gdb/10760] Process record doesn't support instruction 0xf11

[andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com]

------- Additional Comments From andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com  2010-06-23 11:22 -------

I've seen something similar:

"Process record doesn't support instruction 0xfef at address 0xb6e9c778."

It was followed immediately by:

stopped,reason="signal-received",signal-name="0",signal-meaning="Signal
0",frame=s{addr="0xb6e9c777",func="__strlen_sse2",args=[],file="../sysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch/strlen.S",line="75"},thread-id="1",stopped-threads="all",core="1"

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10760

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug gdb/10760] Process record doesn't support instruction 0xf11

[marlowsd at gmail dot com]

------- Additional Comments From marlowsd at gmail dot com  2009-10-12 13:46 -------
We always use SSE for floating-point on x86-64.  Doesn't gcc do the same?


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10760

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug gdb/10760] Process record doesn't support instruction 0xf11

[jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com]

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |10743
              nThis|                            |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10760

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug gdb/10760] Process record doesn't support instruction 0xf11

[jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com  2009-10-12 13:33 -------
Currently record-replay does not support MMX and other CPU extensions.
Couldn't you configure your compilter to avoid using them? (probably not, they
are always present on x86_64)
It may be also considered a duplicate of Bug 10743.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jan dot kratochvil at redhat
                   |                            |dot com
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10760

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.