From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-prs-return-11726-listarch-gdb-prs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22293 invoked by alias); 1 May 2012 18:09:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 22237 invoked by uid 22791); 1 May 2012 18:09:44 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO sourceware.org) (127.0.0.1)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 May 2012 18:09:33 +0000
From: "dje at google dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/10952] Single Stepping into functions is very slow when not
 setting LD_BIND_NOW env variable
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 18:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dje at google dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.1
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-10952-4717-ZULRn6vbn0@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-10952-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-10952-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-prs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-prs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-q2/txt/msg00065.txt.bz2

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10952

--- Comment #4 from dje at google dot com 2012-05-01 18:08:49 UTC ---
Another data point for the same example:

gcov for symtab.c, find_pc_sect_symtab has this:

 32582676: 1968:  ALL_PRIMARY_SYMTABS (objfile, s)
        -: 1969:  {
   206414: 1970:    bv = BLOCKVECTOR (s);
   206414: 1971:    b = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, GLOBAL_BLOCK);

A case for having a list of the symtabs with block vectors not polluted by
symtabs without block vectors (or rather share theirs with the primary - the
include files) ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.