From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-prs-return-10508-listarch-gdb-prs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26859 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2011 15:38:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 26735 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Aug 2011 15:38:28 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO sourceware.org) (127.0.0.1)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:38:07 +0000
From: "marc.khouzam at ericsson dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug symtab/11912] C++ name lookup fails
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: symtab
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marc.khouzam at ericsson dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.1
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-11912-4717-WAsczmamzV@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-11912-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-11912-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-prs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-prs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-q3/txt/msg00254.txt.bz2

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11912

--- Comment #13 from Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam at ericsson dot com> 2011-08-26 15:38:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Is this really a step into the right direction? Isn't the problem rather on the
> "input" side? I think the user should not be required to use 'struct foo' or
> 'class foo' when just using 'foo' is correct C++.

I agree with you.  However, I did not know how to fix the C++ parser to accept
'foo'.

The fix I committed does not solve this PR, but solves a side-effect that would
cause the frontend to get a syntax error using an expression that GDB said to
use.  For details, please see:

http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-09/msg00204.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.