public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug threads/12074] multi-inferior internal error
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 20:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-12074-4717-RxnYUUXkkP@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-12074-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12074

--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Kratochvil <jkratoch@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f0e8c4c5d1bce422ac86090b76c28931b0d240bf

commit f0e8c4c5d1bce422ac86090b76c28931b0d240bf
Author: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Jan 22 21:02:24 2015 +0100

    Print current thread after loading a core file

    downstream Fedora request:
        Please make it easier to find the backtrace of the crashing thread
        https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024504

    Currently after loading a core file GDB prints:

    Core was generated by `./threadcrash1'.
    Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
    8       *(volatile int *)0=0;
    (gdb) _

    there is nowhere seen which of the threads had crashed.  In reality GDB
always
    numbers that thread as #1 and it is the current thread that time.  But
after
    dumping all the info into a file for later analysis it is no longer
obvious.
    'thread apply all bt' even puts the thread #1 to the _end_ of the output!!!

    Should GDB always print after loading a core file what "thread" command
would
    print?
    [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7fcbe28fe700 (LWP 15453))]

    BTW I think it will print the thread even when loading single/non-threaded
    core file when other inferior(s) exist.  But that currently crashes
        [Bug threads/12074] multi-inferior internal error
        https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12074
    plus I think that would be a correct behavior anyway.

    gdb/ChangeLog
    2015-01-22  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>

        * corelow.c (core_open): Call also thread_command.
        * gdbthread.h (thread_command): New prototype moved from ...
        * thread.c (thread_command): ... here.
        (thread_command): Make it global.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-22 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-12074-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-15 19:23 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2012-04-11 15:03 ` palves at redhat dot com
2015-01-17 20:47 ` jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
2015-01-22 20:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-06-13 21:35 ` tromey at sourceware dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-12074-4717-RxnYUUXkkP@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).