public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/12332] Provide efficient source lookup for use by IDE
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-12332-4717-vhQ6DNiGln@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-12332-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12332

Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jan.kratochvil at redhat
                   |                            |dot com

--- Comment #1 from Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com> 2011-02-25 22:56:20 UTC ---
I (briefly) read through the Eclipse Bug but I do not see any indication the
filesystem lookup would be slow.
In fact since Linux kernel dcache (linux-2.1.x or so) any pathname lookups are
blazingly fast:
find $PWD -type f|tr -cd /|wc -c
 = 279751 = directory components for lookup
find $PWD -type f|wc -l
 = 26239 = files = number of breakpoints
time sh -c 'find $PWD -type f|xargs /bin/ls|wc -l'
real 0m0.903s = the overhead of any lookups is really negligible
[ kernel-debug-2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64, i7-920, ext3 fs, second run ]

If you mean slowness on the first run (and on the second run it is already
fast) then it is by the disk access.  But not looking up the leading
directories would not help it as those are already in dcache even in such case.

I would rather bet the slowness is in GDB itself, it has problems handling
1000+ breakpoints even on high-end hardware.  I rather did not expect anyone
would use so many breakpoints.

I already did one breakpoints performance improvement which made the 1000
breakpoints case acceptable again (although it is still far from perfect):
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-10/msg00289.html

I would like to see some oprofile or gprof results first before deciding which
part to fix.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-25 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-17 13:34 [Bug gdb/12332] New: " oss.sprigogin at gmail dot com
2011-02-25 22:56 ` jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com [this message]
2011-02-28  4:24 ` [Bug gdb/12332] " sprigogin at google dot com
2011-03-11 21:03 ` marc.khouzam at ericsson dot com
2011-03-11 21:07 ` marc.khouzam at ericsson dot com
2012-04-16 17:49 ` dje at google dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-12332-4717-vhQ6DNiGln@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).