public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug gdb/12504] New: Process record doesn't support instruction 0x9f
@ 2011-02-22 18:41 wim at heirman dot net
  2011-02-23  9:12 ` [Bug gdb/12504] " wim at heirman dot net
  2011-11-11 18:09 ` tromey at redhat dot com
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: wim at heirman dot net @ 2011-02-22 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12504

           Summary: Process record doesn't support instruction 0x9f
           Product: gdb
           Version: 7.2
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: gdb
        AssignedTo: unassigned@sourceware.org
        ReportedBy: wim@heirman.net


When using record, I get the following error:

Process record does not support instruction 0x9f at address 0x...

My system is Ubuntu 10.04, GCC 4.4, x86_64.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug gdb/12504] Process record doesn't support instruction 0x9f
  2011-02-22 18:41 [Bug gdb/12504] New: Process record doesn't support instruction 0x9f wim at heirman dot net
@ 2011-02-23  9:12 ` wim at heirman dot net
  2011-11-11 18:09 ` tromey at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: wim at heirman dot net @ 2011-02-23  9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12504

Wim Heirman <wim at heirman dot net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|7.2                         |HEAD

--- Comment #1 from Wim Heirman <wim at heirman dot net> 2011-02-23 09:12:07 UTC ---
Same with the CVS version (7.2.50.20110222-cvs).

How complex is it to add support for these new instructions? (Assuming I know
what the opcode does, but I have no prior experience in coding GDB).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug gdb/12504] Process record doesn't support instruction 0x9f
  2011-02-22 18:41 [Bug gdb/12504] New: Process record doesn't support instruction 0x9f wim at heirman dot net
  2011-02-23  9:12 ` [Bug gdb/12504] " wim at heirman dot net
@ 2011-11-11 18:09 ` tromey at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2011-11-11 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12504

Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tromey at redhat dot com

--- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com> 2011-11-11 18:08:53 UTC ---
I have never done it myself, but I think adding some additional
support is pretty easy.  The code is in i386-tdep.c:i386_process_record
(despite its name, this is shared between x86 and x86-64)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-11 18:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-22 18:41 [Bug gdb/12504] New: Process record doesn't support instruction 0x9f wim at heirman dot net
2011-02-23  9:12 ` [Bug gdb/12504] " wim at heirman dot net
2011-11-11 18:09 ` tromey at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).