public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "joachim.protze at zih dot tu-dresden.de" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug python/12533] New: gdb consumes large memory when millions gdb.values are created Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 11:36:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-12533-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12533 Summary: gdb consumes large memory when millions gdb.values are created Product: gdb Version: HEAD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: python AssignedTo: unassigned@sourceware.org ReportedBy: joachim.protze@zih.tu-dresden.de For my current pretty-printer project i collect some metadata in inferior space. This is used to evaluate, how some values - especially send/recv-buffers - should be formated for printout. In some cases it is necessary to evaluate metadata for each single value in buffer, which can be 10k+ values. I observed gdb to consume hundreds of MB memory and tried to analyze the source of the problem with valgrind + massif: most memory is consumed within allocate_value() What i don't understand: why are the value structures not freed while the command is running. Is this an issue of the python interpreter or is this an issue of the gdb-py api? Is there a way to get the values freed? ----------------------------------------- short example to see this behaviour (for RAM <2GB use smaller iteration counts!): (gdb) python v=gdb.parse_and_eval("1") (gdb) python >for i in range(1000000): > v+=1 >end (gdb) python >for i in range(1200000): > v+=1 >end (gdb) gdb consumes 600MB after the 1.0M iterations and 780MB after the 1.2M iterations -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2011-03-02 11:36 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-03-02 11:36 joachim.protze at zih dot tu-dresden.de [this message] 2011-11-23 21:09 ` [Bug python/12533] " tromey at redhat dot com 2011-12-02 18:02 ` tromey at redhat dot com 2011-12-08 19:00 ` ian at mahuron dot org 2011-12-22 19:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-22 19:53 ` tromey at redhat dot com 2011-12-22 21:34 ` ian at mahuron dot org 2011-12-23 2:46 ` tromey at redhat dot com 2012-01-03 19:28 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-03 19:30 ` tromey at redhat dot com 2012-01-03 19:44 ` ian at mahuron dot org 2023-02-27 22:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-12533-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).