public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "andre.poenitz at nokia dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug mi/12555] Hangup in MI commands if python StdStringPrinter used on uninitialized std::string
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-12555-4717-ipTgRyv2mg@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-12555-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12555

--- Comment #6 from Andre Poenitz <andre.poenitz at nokia dot com> 2011-04-18 11:34:44 UTC ---
I still think having a default limit that leave gdb itself (and a frontend
using it) in a usable state would make sense. 

Limiting the size of dumped data to something that finishes dumping in
acceptable time (less than a few seconds in total, given the uncertain number
of items to display a single display should be well under a second) seems to be
a good first approximation at least as long as the data dumping is not
interruptible (see 12615).

Anyway, if you think the frontend should be required to use --limit=100, so be
it.

To the second issue: I don't think the assumption that data display can be
sensibly steered by keeping track of entering and leaving stack frames or block
scopes holds true. Both debugging itself and background activities might (and
typically do) result in changed displays.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-18 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-09 16:03 [Bug mi/12555] New: " jens.elmenthaler at verigy dot com
2011-03-09 16:09 ` [Bug mi/12555] " jens.elmenthaler at verigy dot com
2011-03-09 16:16 ` jens.elmenthaler at verigy dot com
2011-04-18  9:58 ` pmuldoon at redhat dot com
2011-04-18 10:31 ` andre.poenitz at nokia dot com
2011-04-18 10:59 ` pmuldoon at redhat dot com
2011-04-18 11:41 ` andre.poenitz at nokia dot com [this message]
2011-04-18 14:25 ` dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-04-18 16:15 ` marc.khouzam at ericsson dot com
2011-11-10 21:35 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2011-12-07 13:04 ` xgsa at yandex dot ru
2013-07-04 19:51 ` aegges at web dot de
2023-08-31 17:20 ` tromey at sourceware dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-12555-4717-ipTgRyv2mg@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).