public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "andre.poenitz at nokia dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug mi/12555] Hangup in MI commands if python StdStringPrinter used on uninitialized std::string Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:41:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-12555-4717-ipTgRyv2mg@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-12555-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12555 --- Comment #6 from Andre Poenitz <andre.poenitz at nokia dot com> 2011-04-18 11:34:44 UTC --- I still think having a default limit that leave gdb itself (and a frontend using it) in a usable state would make sense. Limiting the size of dumped data to something that finishes dumping in acceptable time (less than a few seconds in total, given the uncertain number of items to display a single display should be well under a second) seems to be a good first approximation at least as long as the data dumping is not interruptible (see 12615). Anyway, if you think the frontend should be required to use --limit=100, so be it. To the second issue: I don't think the assumption that data display can be sensibly steered by keeping track of entering and leaving stack frames or block scopes holds true. Both debugging itself and background activities might (and typically do) result in changed displays. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-18 11:41 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-03-09 16:03 [Bug mi/12555] New: " jens.elmenthaler at verigy dot com 2011-03-09 16:09 ` [Bug mi/12555] " jens.elmenthaler at verigy dot com 2011-03-09 16:16 ` jens.elmenthaler at verigy dot com 2011-04-18 9:58 ` pmuldoon at redhat dot com 2011-04-18 10:31 ` andre.poenitz at nokia dot com 2011-04-18 10:59 ` pmuldoon at redhat dot com 2011-04-18 11:41 ` andre.poenitz at nokia dot com [this message] 2011-04-18 14:25 ` dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-04-18 16:15 ` marc.khouzam at ericsson dot com 2011-11-10 21:35 ` tromey at redhat dot com 2011-12-07 13:04 ` xgsa at yandex dot ru 2013-07-04 19:51 ` aegges at web dot de 2023-08-31 17:20 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-12555-4717-ipTgRyv2mg@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).