public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rbusser at lgcpi dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug build/12925] New: link creating libsim.a has multiple definition problems
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-12925-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12925

           Summary: link creating libsim.a has multiple definition
                    problems
           Product: gdb
           Version: 7.2
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: build
        AssignedTo: unassigned@sourceware.org
        ReportedBy: rbusser@lgcpi.com


building a gdb with simulation capability for the powerpc results in a linker
problem.

inline.c has these preprocessor commands

#if (SEMANTICS_INLINE & INCLUDE_MODULE)
#include "semantics.c"
#endif

#if (IDECODE_INLINE & INCLUDE_MODULE)
#include "idecode.c"
#endif


if SEMANTICS_INLINE is defined, sementics.c gets inlined into idecode.c. The
problem here is that semantics.c includes a global declaration around line #37

int option_mpc860c0 = 0;

So, when the linker attempts to create libsim.a with this command

ar rc libsim.a debug.o filter_filename.o bits.o sim-endian.o os_emul.o
emul_generic.o emul_bugapi.o emul_chirp.o emul_netbsd.o emul_unix.o registers.o
vm.o corefile.o model.o spreg.o cpu.o interrupts.o events.o cap.o device.o
tree.o device_table.o itable.o mon.o icache.o semantics.o idecode.o support.o
sim-fpu.o psim.o version.o pk_disklabel.o hw_cpu.o hw_memory.o hw_nvram.o
hw_iobus.o hw_htab.o hw_disk.o hw_trace.o hw_register.o hw_vm.o hw_init.o
hw_core.o hw_pal.o hw_com.o hw_eeprom.o hw_opic.o hw_glue.o hw_phb.o hw_ide.o
options.o gdb-sim.o sim_calls.o callback.o targ-map.o

which attempts to link both semantics.o and idecode.o the result is a multiple
definitions error involving option_mpc860c0.

Then, if you remove the definition of SEMANTICS_INLINE by commenting out these
lines in ppc-config.h

/*
#ifndef SEMANTICS_INLINE
#define SEMANTICS_INLINE        (DEFAULT_INLINE & ~INLINE_MODULE)
#endif
*/

line #157 in options.c 

  printf_filtered ("SEMANTICS_INLINE         = %s\n", options_inline
(SEMANTICS_INLINE));

complains. It is in a print function called "print_options" which apparently
assumes that SEMANTICS_INLINE is always defined.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


             reply	other threads:[~2011-06-23 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-23 15:02 rbusser at lgcpi dot com [this message]
2015-03-29 22:01 ` [Bug sim/12925] link sim " vapier at gentoo dot org
2015-03-29 22:02 ` vapier at gentoo dot org
2021-10-03 15:40 ` vapier at gentoo dot org
2021-10-31  9:33 ` vapier at gentoo dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-12925-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).