public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "palves at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug cli/13728] GDB crashes on catch exec -> detach Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:20:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-13728-4717-qYx7hUZqpw@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-13728-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13728 Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |palves at redhat dot com --- Comment #3 from Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> 2012-03-14 15:20:17 UTC --- Yeah. This made me question whether we really want to continue processing the commands if the thread that hit the breakpoint is gone (detach/disconnect/kill/etc.). We similarly stop processing if the target is proceeded, which made me wonder about doing the same here, but in proceed case, we have extra complications, for example, related to ending up with more than one bpstat active for the same thread. So if we can make this work, it seems like we should try. Does that patch even run "valgrind free" ? It seems like you'd restore the bpstat into: inferior_thread ()->control.stop_bpstat But that thread has been deleted/free'd, along with its stop_bpstat. If we remove the bpstat temporarily out of the thread, as in: /* This pointer will iterate over the list of bpstat's. */ bs = *bsp; + *bsp = NULL; Then if something in the command list deletes a breakpoint that was in the bpstat, bpstat_remove_breakpoint_callback will not be able to find the bpstat, and we will end up a stale breakpoint pointer in the bpstat. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-14 15:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-02-23 10:18 [Bug cli/13728] New: " jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com 2012-02-29 17:02 ` [Bug cli/13728] " tromey at redhat dot com 2012-02-29 21:43 ` tromey at redhat dot com 2012-03-14 15:20 ` palves at redhat dot com [this message] 2024-01-09 19:53 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-13728-4717-qYx7hUZqpw@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).