public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tromey at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug python/14386] std::bitset not iterable
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-14386-4717-jsAWtziiTX@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-14386-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14386
--- Comment #6 from Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com> 2012-08-06 18:41:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The thing is, that the message for -var-list-children is correct, because the
> returned value is not iterable. As much as i know bitset doesn't have an
> iterator.
This message does not refer to the bitset in your program, but rather to
a Python object created by the pretty-printer for the bitset.
> The question that I have is more or less, why there is an implemented methode
> for children.
This approach lets MI clients decide how many children to show (consider,
e.g., a vector of 1000 elements), and it lets the CLI apply various
"set print" settings, like "set print elements", to pretty-printed values.
> Is there a way to leave the output for the
> var-list-children methode as it was but using the new output for print and
> -data-eval...
MI clients can disable pretty-printing per-varobj. See the manual for details.
> Would be nice to have some workaround, but bitset is not iterable is the worst
> output i can get, even the old is better.
If you encounter a pretty-printer bug you can bypass the Python code with
"print/r"
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-06 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-23 8:02 [Bug python/14386] New: " andreasheimberger at gmx dot at
2012-07-31 16:00 ` [Bug python/14386] " tromey at redhat dot com
2012-07-31 21:27 ` andreasheimberger at gmx dot at
2012-08-01 16:02 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2012-08-01 16:21 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2012-08-01 16:30 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2012-08-01 19:17 ` andreasheimberger at gmx dot at
2012-08-06 18:41 ` tromey at redhat dot com [this message]
2012-08-06 18:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-06 18:45 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2012-08-06 18:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-16 17:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-16 17:10 ` tromey at redhat dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-14386-4717-jsAWtziiTX@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).