From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6221 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2012 18:41:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 6200 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Aug 2012 18:41:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO sourceware.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:41:34 +0000 From: "tromey at redhat dot com" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug python/14386] std::bitset not iterable Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:41:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: python X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tromey at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q3/txt/msg00173.txt.bz2 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14386 --- Comment #6 from Tom Tromey 2012-08-06 18:41:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > The thing is, that the message for -var-list-children is correct, because the > returned value is not iterable. As much as i know bitset doesn't have an > iterator. This message does not refer to the bitset in your program, but rather to a Python object created by the pretty-printer for the bitset. > The question that I have is more or less, why there is an implemented methode > for children. This approach lets MI clients decide how many children to show (consider, e.g., a vector of 1000 elements), and it lets the CLI apply various "set print" settings, like "set print elements", to pretty-printed values. > Is there a way to leave the output for the > var-list-children methode as it was but using the new output for print and > -data-eval... MI clients can disable pretty-printing per-varobj. See the manual for details. > Would be nice to have some workaround, but bitset is not iterable is the worst > output i can get, even the old is better. If you encounter a pretty-printer bug you can bypass the Python code with "print/r" -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.