public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug backtrace/14506] New: signal frame should display the signal
@ 2012-08-22 1:56 tromey at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2012-08-22 1:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14506
Bug #: 14506
Summary: signal frame should display the signal
Product: gdb
Version: unknown
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: backtrace
AssignedTo: unassigned@sourceware.org
ReportedBy: tromey@redhat.com
Classification: Unclassified
Currently a backtrace will just print this for a signal delivery:
#3 <signal handler called>
gdb often knows the signal here, so it should display it.
If you look at the backtrace here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849588
Direct link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=605630
... you can see a case where the signal is not evident in the bt.
The bt output makes it look like the signal calls quit_force directly.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-08-22 1:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-22 1:56 [Bug backtrace/14506] New: signal frame should display the signal tromey at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).