public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "aburgess at broadcom dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug symtab/14605] New: Display of partially optimised out variables from registers, using dwarf piece info.
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-14605-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14605
Bug #: 14605
Summary: Display of partially optimised out variables from
registers, using dwarf piece info.
Product: gdb
Version: HEAD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: symtab
AssignedTo: unassigned@sourceware.org
ReportedBy: aburgess@broadcom.com
Classification: Unclassified
Created attachment 6645
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6645
An x86-64 assembler test file for this bug.
Raising defect as requested in this gdb-patches mailing list thread:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-08/msg00715.html
This bug is for a failure in the test gdb.dwarf2/dw2-op-out-param.exp that
was added at the end of the above mailing list thread.
If a variable is described by the DWARF as being split over multiple
registers using DWARF piece information, but some of those register are
marked as optimised out by a later frame then gdb incorrectly believes the
value of those pieces is zero.
Having a variable help in a register that is marked as optimised out by a
later frame should probably be fixed in the dwarf producer, however, it is
interesting in this case that gdb, without error or warning displays
the *wrong* answer. However, no example of this bug has yet been seen in
the wild.
The test creates two call stacks:
main --> struct_param_two_reg_pieces --> breakpt
main --> int_param_two_reg_pieces --> breakpt
In each function "struct_param_two_reg_pieces" and
"int_param_two_reg_pieces" variables are placed in multiple register using
piece information, and the function "breakpt" marks some of these
registers as optimised out.
The test file is x86-64 specific, download test.S, and assemble as:
gcc -o test test.S
Then run gdb as:
> gdb test
(gdb) break breakpt
Breakpoint 1 at 0x4004fb
(gdb) r
Starting program: /projects/firepath_work/aburgess/tmp/gdb/test
warning: no loadable sections found in added symbol-file system-supplied DSO at
0x2aaaaaaab000
Breakpoint 1, 0x00000000004004fb in breakpt ()
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Breakpoint 1, 0x00000000004004fb in breakpt ()
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Breakpoint 1, 0x00000000004004fb in breakpt ()
(gdb) set output-radix 16
Output radix now set to decimal 16, hex 10, octal 20.
(gdb) set print frame-arguments all
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00000000004004fb in breakpt ()
#1 0x000000000040052e in struct_param_two_reg_pieces (operand0=
{a = 0xdeadbe04deadbe05, b = 0x0}, operand1=
{a = 0x0, b = 0xdeadbe00deadbe01}, operand2={a = 0x0, b = 0x0})
#2 0x00000000004004ef in main ()
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Breakpoint 1, 0x00000000004004fb in breakpt ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00000000004004fb in breakpt ()
#1 0x000000000040053e in int_param_two_reg_pieces (operand0=0xdeadbe05,
operand1=0xdeadbe0100000000, operand2=0x0)
#2 0x00000000004004f5 in main ()
(gdb) quit
## END ##
In both backtraces the values for operand0, operand1, and operand2 are
wrong.
In the first backtrace the correct values are:
operand0={a = 0xdeadbe04deadbe05, b = <optimized out>}
operand1={a = <optimized out>, b = 0xdeadbe00deadbe01}
operand2=<optimized out>
In the second backtrace the correct values are:
operand0=<optimized out>
operand1=<optimized out>
operand2=<optimized out>
In the second case we must mark the whole value as optimised out as the
variable is an integer type, I can't imagine how we'd show a partially
optimised out integer variable.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2012-09-21 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-21 16:33 aburgess at broadcom dot com [this message]
2014-08-19 23:36 ` [Bug symtab/14605] " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-08-21 11:40 ` palves at redhat dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-14605-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).