public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dblaikie at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/14971] Failures in gdb.base/longjmp.exp
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-14971-4717-KHah27PI0d@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-14971-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14971

--- Comment #9 from David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail dot com> 2013-01-17 19:05:20 UTC ---
> I tend to think it isn't too bad to live with a spurious
> FAIL or two.  This is pretty much the normal state for
> the gdb test suite anyway.

Some backstory:

I'm currently running a modified version of the GDB 7.5 suite against Clang in
a buildbot. Apart from two flakey tests (tls.exp and funcargs.exp) I seem to
have it pretty much stable. Failures are generally actionable & appropriately
blamed, etc.

I'm now trying to upstream the appropriate changes (things like the patches
I've already sent to gdb and gcc) and get to the point where I can run a
buildbot using GDB ToT and Clang ToT. I'll only be able to do this if I can get
stable red/green results - a few spurious failures are going to block that
effort. So, one way or another, I will be trying to find a way to resolve these
failures. While upgrading glibc on my build slaves may be one solution, I was
hoping for a solution that would scale better to other machines/users (so that
developers of GDB or Clang attempting to reproduce failures or just running the
suite on a new change to avoid committing regressions wouldn't see spurious
extra failures that could lead them down the wrong path)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-17 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-17 22:30 [Bug gdb/14971] New: " dblaikie at gmail dot com
2013-01-03 11:26 ` [Bug gdb/14971] " palves at redhat dot com
2013-01-03 19:37 ` dblaikie at gmail dot com
2013-01-16 18:45 ` palves at redhat dot com
2013-01-17  4:48 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2013-01-17 17:27 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2013-01-17 17:45 ` palves at redhat dot com
2013-01-17 17:59 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2013-01-17 18:08 ` palves at redhat dot com
2013-01-17 19:05 ` dblaikie at gmail dot com [this message]
2013-01-17 19:17 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2013-11-05 12:26 ` macro@linux-mips.org
2013-11-05 19:42 ` palves at redhat dot com
2013-11-12 14:59 ` tromey at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-14971-4717-KHah27PI0d@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).