From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22392 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2013 19:57:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 22361 invoked by uid 48); 18 Jan 2013 19:57:38 -0000 From: "jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug backtrace/15032] GNU/Linux backtrace fails to use eh_frame information when built with --enable-64-bit-bfd Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:57:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: backtrace X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-q1/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15032 Jan Kratochvil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.kratochvil at redhat | |dot com --- Comment #1 from Jan Kratochvil 2013-01-18 19:57:33 UTC --- The problem is 0xfff7bb90 should have been 64-bit extended as 0xfffffffffff7bb90 and then it would all work. But I do not see where the bug is without a reproducer, couldn't you provide some such 32-bit binary? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.