From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1324 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2013 20:38:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 997 invoked by uid 48); 18 Jan 2013 20:38:03 -0000 From: "jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug backtrace/15032] GNU/Linux backtrace fails to use eh_frame information when built with --enable-64-bit-bfd Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:38:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: backtrace X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-q1/txt/msg00097.txt.bz2 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15032 --- Comment #3 from Jan Kratochvil 2013-01-18 20:38:00 UTC --- x86* arch does not use bfd_get_sign_extend_vma so it is correct DW_EH_PE_signed is not set. The file probably got relocated by BFD, I do not have an answer now but I was curious how the whole setup could happen, base address is small positive increment and the 0xfff7bb90 address overflows by it, that should not happen. Maybe the base should have been 0xffffffff000bfd60. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.