From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-prs-return-13755-listarch-gdb-prs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 15917 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2013 16:05:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-prs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-prs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 15857 invoked by uid 48); 3 Jun 2013 16:05:53 -0000
From: "simon.marchi at ericsson dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug mi/15564] New: MI thread-exited event inconsistency when
 detaching
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 16:05:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: mi
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: simon.marchi at ericsson dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
Message-ID: <bug-15564-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-q2/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15564

            Bug ID: 15564
           Summary: MI thread-exited event inconsistency when detaching
           Product: gdb
           Version: HEAD
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: mi
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: simon.marchi at ericsson dot com

When attaching and detaching a process, we see two different behavior depending
on if we pass through a gdbserver or if we do it natively. The difference is
whether the thread-exited event is emitted or not.


Attaching and detaching a process without directly (no gdbserver)
$ gdb -i mi
=thread-group-added,id="i1"
(gdb)
-target-attach 5422
=thread-group-started,id="i1",pid="5422"
=thread-created,id="1",group-id="i1"
=library-loaded,id="/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6",target-name="/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6",host-name="/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6",symbols-loaded="0",thread-group="i1"
=library-loaded,id="/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2",target-name="/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2",host-name="/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2",symbols-loaded="0",thread-group="i1"
*stopped,frame={addr="0x00007fe48e131d20",func="nanosleep",args=[],from="/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6"},thread-id="1",stopped-threads="all",core="1"
^done
(gdb)
-target-detach
=thread-group-exited,id="i1"
=library-unloaded,id="/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6",target-name="/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6",host-name="/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6",thread-group="i1"
=library-unloaded,id="/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2",target-name="/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2",host-name="/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2",thread-group="i1"
^done
(gdb)


Attaching and detaching a process through gdbserver
(start gdbserver and attach the process)
$ gdbserver --attach :1234 5422

$ gdb -i mi
=thread-group-added,id="i1"
(gdb)
-target-select extended-remote :1234
=thread-group-started,id="i1",pid="5422"
=thread-created,id="1",group-id="i1"

&"warning: Could not load vsyscall page because no executable was
specified\ntry using the \"file\" command first."

&"\n"
*stopped,frame={addr="0x00007fe48e131d20",func="??",args=[]},thread-id="1",stopped-threads="all",core="3"
=tsv-created,name="trace_timestamp",initial="0"\n
^connected
(gdb)
-target-detach
=thread-exited,id="1",group-id="i1"
=thread-group-exited,id="i1"
^done
(gdb)

Reference: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2013-05/msg00149.html

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.