From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-prs-return-13939-listarch-gdb-prs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20400 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2013 11:05:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-prs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-prs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 20375 invoked by uid 48); 28 Jun 2013 11:05:49 -0000
From: "palves at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug breakpoints/15693] Extra *running event when call-style dprintf
 hits
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:05:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: breakpoints
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: palves at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-15693-4717-X2V3Jymunu@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-15693-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-15693-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-q2/txt/msg00528.txt.bz2

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15693

Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |palves at redhat dot com

--- Comment #1 from Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> ---
Yeah, you'll this for all infcalls, not just dprintf+call.  E.g., with
something like:

#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

int
return_false (void)
{
  return 0;
}

int
main ()
{
  while (1)
    usleep (1);
}

$ gdb return-false -i=mi

(gdb) 
start
...
(gdb) 
b 14 if return_false ()
&"b 14 if return_false ()\n"
~"Breakpoint 2 at 0x4004eb: file return-false.c, line 14.\n"
...
^done
(gdb) 
c
&"c\n"
~"Continuing.\n"
^running
*running,thread-id="1"
(gdb) 
*running,thread-id="1"
*running,thread-id="1"
*running,thread-id="1"
*running,thread-id="1"
*running,thread-id="1"
*running,thread-id="1"
... repeat forever ...

We should be suppressing that if we never told the user/frontend the thread was
stopped.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.