public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "b.r.longbons at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug c++/15801] some C++11 symbols can't be demangled Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 05:04:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-15801-4717-MYSf0uOLym@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-15801-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15801 --- Comment #2 from Ben Longbons <b.r.longbons at gmail dot com> --- I didn't realize you had to (gdb) set lang c++ I recommend a warning; I did not expect this from (gdb) help maint demangle There *is*, however, still the bug that originally lead me on this hunt: A previous version of gcc (4.6) mangled symbols wrong (I instead of J for packs; I did read the mangling ABI spec), so (for bugward ABI compatibility) recent versions of gcc (4.7, 4.8) emit two symbols pointing to the same address. I don't know if there actually remains enough information to consistently pick the right one, unless you do a hacky heuristic like "if there is more than one symbol for an address, prefer the one with more Js and less Is". Oddly, however, c++filt 2.23 sometimes manages to demangle even the incorrect mangling. But gdb sometimes gives up and sometimes produces a totally bogus demangling (c++filt does not do this). The exact details of this problem are hard to investigate because of bug 12707 ... it sometimes makes a difference whether debug symbols are on or off. I'll make an attachment with some further commentary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-30 5:04 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-07-30 1:06 [Bug c++/15801] New: " b.r.longbons at gmail dot com 2013-07-30 1:46 ` [Bug c++/15801] " keiths at redhat dot com 2013-07-30 5:04 ` b.r.longbons at gmail dot com [this message] 2013-07-30 5:57 ` b.r.longbons at gmail dot com 2013-08-01 5:53 ` b.r.longbons at gmail dot com 2022-12-23 19:20 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-15801-4717-MYSf0uOLym@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).