public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug python/15978] New: support weakref for all python classes
@ 2013-09-24 20:37 b.r.longbons at gmail dot com
2013-09-24 23:20 ` [Bug python/15978] " naesten at gmail dot com
2022-06-07 21:26 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: b.r.longbons at gmail dot com @ 2013-09-24 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15978
Bug ID: 15978
Summary: support weakref for all python classes
Product: gdb
Version: unknown
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: python
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: b.r.longbons at gmail dot com
IWBN if all of gdb's classes allowed weak references, via python's weakref
module. This provides a much better lifetime model than events.
Most python objects (that have __dict__) automatically support weakref. If a
classes uses __slots__, it must include '__weakref__'. I have no clue how to
implement this for classes created in C though.
test code for a -gdb.py file is:
import gdb
import weakref
print(weakref.ref(gdb.current_objfile()))
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug python/15978] support weakref for all python classes
2013-09-24 20:37 [Bug python/15978] New: support weakref for all python classes b.r.longbons at gmail dot com
@ 2013-09-24 23:20 ` naesten at gmail dot com
2022-06-07 21:26 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: naesten at gmail dot com @ 2013-09-24 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15978
Samuel Bronson <naesten at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |naesten at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from Samuel Bronson <naesten at gmail dot com> ---
I have a clue:
http://docs.python.org/2/extending/newtypes.html#weak-reference-support
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug python/15978] support weakref for all python classes
2013-09-24 20:37 [Bug python/15978] New: support weakref for all python classes b.r.longbons at gmail dot com
2013-09-24 23:20 ` [Bug python/15978] " naesten at gmail dot com
@ 2022-06-07 21:26 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2022-06-07 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15978
Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tromey at sourceware dot org
--- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
Supporting weakref seems fine & pretty easy.
I wish there was some idiom for supporting the common gdb situation
where there is a Python wrapper for some underlying object that
has its own independent lifetime.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-07 21:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-24 20:37 [Bug python/15978] New: support weakref for all python classes b.r.longbons at gmail dot com
2013-09-24 23:20 ` [Bug python/15978] " naesten at gmail dot com
2022-06-07 21:26 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).