public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dje at google dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug python/16196] New: lazy string vs "print elements"
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 21:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-16196-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16196

            Bug ID: 16196
           Summary: lazy string vs "print elements"
           Product: gdb
           Version: HEAD
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: python
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: dje at google dot com

Bug 10633 says this is fixed, and the printing may be, but there's an
optimization to be had here.
read_string doesn't obey fetchlimit if len != -1.
So if one is printing an uninitialized string, or just a very long string,
gdb will read the whole thing, even if "print elements" is much smaller.

Plus I found another issue:
- long -> int conversion in the extracted lazy string length loses precision
  [which while one wouldn't expect to have 4G strings, pretty printing an
uninitialized object should have more consistent behaviour]

Repro:
create long c++ string, set target debug 1, and print the string.
How many bytes are read from the target?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


             reply	other threads:[~2013-11-20 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-20 21:28 dje at google dot com [this message]
2013-11-20 21:29 ` [Bug python/16196] " dje at google dot com
2013-11-22 20:32 ` dje at google dot com
2013-11-22 22:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-22 22:25 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-23  7:20 ` asmwarrior at gmail dot com
2013-11-24  7:33 ` asmwarrior at gmail dot com
2023-12-09 13:04 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-16196-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).