[Bug gdb/16305] New: Process record does not support instruction 0xf6f at address 0x4ec15c.

[Bug gdb/16305] New: Process record does not support instruction 0xf6f at address 0x4ec15c.

[hjl.tools at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16305

            Bug ID: 16305
           Summary: Process record does not support instruction 0xf6f at
                    address 0x4ec15c.
           Product: gdb
           Version: 7.6
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: gdb
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com

0xf6f is one of

   0:    f3 0f 6f 00              movdqu (%rax),%xmm0
   4:    f3 41 0f 6f 07           movdqu (%r15),%xmm0
   9:    67 f3 41 0f 6f 07        movdqu (%r15d),%xmm0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gdb/16305] Process record does not support instruction 0xf6f at address 0x4ec15c.

[hjl.tools at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16305

--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
The problem is "f3 41 0f 6f" doesn't match 0xf30f6f.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gdb/16305] Process record does not support instruction 0xf6f at address 0x4ec15c.

[hjl.tools at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16305

--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
REX byte isn't handled properly.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gdb/16305] Process record does not support instruction 0xf6f at address 0x4ec15c.

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16305

--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".

The branch, master has been updated
       via  f9fda3f571bef013565e8a6632e9cf303f6c5eae (commit)
      from  1e87984a63faf4378f6f71c407f7e969441b944e (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f9fda3f571bef013565e8a6632e9cf303f6c5eae

commit f9fda3f571bef013565e8a6632e9cf303f6c5eae
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu Dec 19 14:28:18 2013 -0800

    Mask out PREFIX_ADDR when adding prefix to opcode

    PREFIX_ADDR isn't a prefix to opcode.  This patch masks out PREFIX_ADDR
    when adding prefix to opcode.

        PR gdb/16305
        * i386-tdep.c (i386_process_record): Mask out PREFIX_ADDR when
        adding prefix to opcode.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 gdb/ChangeLog   |    6 ++++++
 gdb/i386-tdep.c |    3 ++-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gdb/16305] Process record does not support instruction 0xf6f at address 0x4ec15c.

[hjl.tools at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16305

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |7.7

--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
Fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.