[Bug server/16359] New: gdbserver needs to handle gdb going away more robustly

[Bug server/16359] New: gdbserver needs to handle gdb going away more robustly

[dje at google dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16359

            Bug ID: 16359
           Summary: gdbserver needs to handle gdb going away more robustly
           Product: gdb
           Version: HEAD
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: server
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: dje at google dot com

gdbserver --multi, target extended-remote, amd64-linux

If you kill -9 gdb (as a proxy for gdb being terminated for unexpected
reasons), gdbserver will arrive here:

static void
input_interrupt (int unused)
{
  fd_set readset;
  struct timeval immediate = { 0, 0 };

  /* Protect against spurious interrupts.  This has been observed to            
     be a problem under NetBSD 1.4 and 1.5.  */

  FD_ZERO (&readset);
  FD_SET (remote_desc, &readset);
  if (select (remote_desc + 1, &readset, 0, 0, &immediate) > 0)
    {
      int cc;
      char c = 0;

      cc = read_prim (&c, 1);

      if (cc != 1 || c != '\003' || current_inferior == NULL)
        {
          fprintf (stderr, "input_interrupt, count = %d c = %d ('%c')\n",
                   cc, c, c);
          return;
        }

      (*the_target->request_interrupt) ();
    }
}

and print:

input_interrupt, count = 0 c = 0 ('^@')

Subsequent connection attempts from gdb do not succeed.
gdbserver could handle this more robustly by detecting EOF and treating it like
any other disconnect (detaching from inferior and going back to waiting for a
connection).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug server/16359] gdbserver needs to handle gdb going away more robustly

[rtaylor at synopsys dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16359

Randy Taylor <rtaylor at synopsys dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rtaylor at synopsys dot com

--- Comment #1 from Randy Taylor <rtaylor at synopsys dot com> ---
We are seeing this problem at Synopsys when trying to reconnect to disconnected
gdb sessions.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.