public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug gdb/16481] New: Python finish breakpoint does not work with a mix of inlined and tailcalled functions
@ 2014-01-21 22:51 simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
2014-01-21 22:58 ` [Bug python/16481] " simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
2023-12-15 19:59 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca @ 2014-01-21 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16481
Bug ID: 16481
Summary: Python finish breakpoint does not work with a mix of
inlined and tailcalled functions
Product: gdb
Version: HEAD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gdb
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
This may seem a little far fetched, but I hit this while trying to track memory
allocations with a python script. I put a Python breakpoint on __libc_malloc,
which in turn sets a finish breakpoint so that I can get the pointer to the
allocated region. I noticed that some times, the finish breakpoint is never
hit.
I put up a very simple test case here:
https://gist.github.com/simark/8548964
Compile with
$ gcc -g test.c -O3
Run with
$ gdb -x finish.py a.out
As the name describe, hopefully_inlined is inlined, hopefully_tailcalled is
tailcalled (did I just invent a verb?).
The python script sets a breakpoint on the hopefully_notinlined function, which
instanciantes a finish breakpoint. On exit of the function, we should see "I am
here", but we don't.
I diagnosed the problem, and something wrong seems to happen here:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=gdb/breakpoint.c;h=c8e7e8842e2ed418d78b23c466018c88bb5e2aae;hb=HEAD#l5172
>From what I understand, for kinds of breakpoints where it makes sens, GDB
checks that the current stack frame is the same as when the breakpoint was set.
For the breakpoint to cause a stop, they have to match. The comparison in this
case returns false. One of the frames has its artifical_depth to zero while the
other has it to one. I am not sure which one is right, but I think that they
should be equal...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-15 19:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-21 22:51 [Bug gdb/16481] New: Python finish breakpoint does not work with a mix of inlined and tailcalled functions simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
2014-01-21 22:58 ` [Bug python/16481] " simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
2023-12-15 19:59 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).