From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22525 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2014 12:55:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22497 invoked by uid 48); 21 Feb 2014 12:55:01 -0000 From: "pmuldoon at redhat dot com" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug python/16486] differences between "bt" and "bt no-filters" Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: python X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pmuldoon at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-q1/txt/msg00264.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16486 Phil Muldoon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pmuldoon at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Phil Muldoon --- I've added the missing wrap hints in the same places as the "no-filter" option. I will submit that soon. However, I also noticed that for the first frame, the "no-filter" option does not print an address, but the frame filtered version does. I looked into this, and if the sal.pc == current_frame.pc then the address is not printed. (This is the line in GDB) Breakpoint 2, frame_show_address (frame=0x101ad50, sal=...) at ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/stack.c:146 146 return get_frame_pc (frame) != sal.pc; I thought about fixing this, but I think it is somewhat of an arbitrary decision for GDB to make over the frame filters. After all, each frame filter can either choose to show whatever address on whatever line it chooses. So I decided not to fix that. What do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.