public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug build/16550] New: bfd/cache.c doesn't compile with gcc -m64 on Solaris
@ 2014-02-10 14:11 ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
  2014-02-10 15:28 ` [Bug build/16550] " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2014-02-10 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16550

            Bug ID: 16550
           Summary: bfd/cache.c doesn't compile with gcc -m64 on Solaris
           Product: gdb
           Version: HEAD
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: build
          Assignee: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
          Reporter: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
              Host: *-*-solaris2.*
            Target: *-*-solaris2.*
             Build: *-*-solaris2.*

On current mainline, gdb 7.7 and binutils 2.24 branches, bfd/cache.c doesn't
compile with gcc -m64 on Solaris 8 to 11:

cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/vol/src/gnu/gdb/gdb-7.7/bfd/cache.c: In function 'bfd_cache_max_open':
/vol/src/gnu/gdb/gdb-7.7/bfd/cache.c:85: error: comparison between signed and
unsigned integer expressions

This is a regression from previous releases.

The error is about

      && rlim.rlim_cur != RLIM_INFINITY)

where <sys/resource.h> has

typedef unsigned long   rlim_t;
#define RLIM_INFINITY   (-3l)

  Rainer

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug build/16550] bfd/cache.c doesn't compile with gcc -m64 on Solaris
  2014-02-10 14:11 [Bug build/16550] New: bfd/cache.c doesn't compile with gcc -m64 on Solaris ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2014-02-10 15:28 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-10 15:44 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
  2014-05-05 21:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-02-10 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16550

--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".

The branch, gdb-7.7-branch has been updated
       via  db269beda438e4f53223fa15bc0a6f30458ca6cb (commit)
      from  d0be77a38c74fdceade49f8bb2e8dd7c0515a095 (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=db269beda438e4f53223fa15bc0a6f30458ca6cb

commit db269beda438e4f53223fa15bc0a6f30458ca6cb
Author: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Date:   Mon Feb 10 16:25:56 2014 +0100

        PR build/16550
        * cache.c (bfd_cache_max_open): Cast RLIM_INFINITY to rlim_t.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 bfd/ChangeLog |    5 +++++
 bfd/cache.c   |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug build/16550] bfd/cache.c doesn't compile with gcc -m64 on Solaris
  2014-02-10 14:11 [Bug build/16550] New: bfd/cache.c doesn't compile with gcc -m64 on Solaris ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
  2014-02-10 15:28 ` [Bug build/16550] " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-02-10 15:44 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
  2014-05-05 21:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2014-02-10 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16550

Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
Fixed for gdb 7.8, 7.7.1.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug build/16550] bfd/cache.c doesn't compile with gcc -m64 on Solaris
  2014-02-10 14:11 [Bug build/16550] New: bfd/cache.c doesn't compile with gcc -m64 on Solaris ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
  2014-02-10 15:28 ` [Bug build/16550] " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-02-10 15:44 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2014-05-05 21:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-05 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16550

--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".

The annotated tag, gdb-7.7.1-release has been created
        at  af2cd04ccdd7631f4009b2aef5c8402b97d732e6 (tag)
   tagging  4bd8fc3a1362970d9800a263987af8093798338b (commit)
  replaces  gdb-7.7-release
 tagged by  Joel Brobecker
        on  Mon May 5 14:53:19 2014 -0700

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
GDB 7.7.1 Release.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlNoCE8ACgkQku2wS/8yXPMbgQCgiCmLYGN3tjnqEEc0Y0i4iCHj
RN8AnRgphFx5RnfZ5TSUHgC6mVHel7sC
=xfEO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Eli Zaretskii (1):
      PR gdb/14018 -- avoid "PC register not available" errors.

GDB Administrator (88):
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in
      Automatic date update in version.in

Jan Kratochvil (3):
      Fix Python stack corruption
      PR gdb/16626
      PR gdb/16626

Joel Brobecker (3):
      Document the GDB 7.7 release in gdb/ChangeLog
      Bump GDB version number to 7.7.0.DATE-cvs.
      Set GDB version number to 7.7.1.

Nick Clifton (1):
      Following up on Tom's suggestion I am checking in a patch to replace the
various

Pedro Alves (3):
      Make sure we don't resume the stepped thread by accident.
      PR gdb/16575: stale breakpoint instructions in the code cache
      AIX 32-bit core loading, high section addresses.

Pierre Langlois (1):
      Erroneous backtrace on AVR.

Rainer Orth (1):
      PR build/16550

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-05 21:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-10 14:11 [Bug build/16550] New: bfd/cache.c doesn't compile with gcc -m64 on Solaris ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2014-02-10 15:28 ` [Bug build/16550] " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-10 15:44 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2014-05-05 21:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).